McKinsey-style Strategic Review · Prepared by Patri Group

The Acton Editions Account

A blind-spot analysis for Deliveroo Account Management
Prepared for: Deliveroo Editions Account Team
Prepared by: Patri Group · Puneet Wadhwani
Period analysed: 22 July 2024 – 10 May 2026 (22 months)
Status: Strictly Confidential · For commercial discussion
Page 1 / 14
Executive Summary

Deliveroo's pricing structure on the Acton account is destroying long-term value for both parties — and the data has been hiding in plain sight

1
£222k extracted from this single Acton site over 22 months (commission + ad spend + licence + ops fee). Among the most lucrative single-site Editions accounts in West London on a per-£ basis.
2
The operator was loss-making for one year only (2025, driven by internal labour cost spike — now corrected). 2024 and 2026 YTD show positive operating margins.
3
The current licence + ops fee structure (~£22k/yr) costs Deliveroo more than it earns. If it pushes the operator to exit, Deliveroo loses £100k+/yr of commission and ad spend to gain £22k of held rent.
4
The operator has a credible scale plan — 5-10 new kitchens over 3 years, contingent on rent renegotiation. Each new kitchen adds ~£100k+/yr to Deliveroo's top line.
5
Recommendation: Restructure the licence agreement to a growth-linked model. Trade £22k/yr of guaranteed rent for £100k+/yr of upside-aligned growth.
Page 2 / 14
Section 1 · The Account in Numbers

The Acton site has been a meaningful contributor to Deliveroo's economics for 22 consecutive months

Exhibit 1: Deliveroo's revenue from the Acton site, by year
Line2024 (Jul-Dec)2025 (Full Year)2026 YTD22-Mo Total% of total
Commission£39,524£72,255£18,367£130,14663%
Marketer Adverts (ad spend)£13,719£24,847£6,404£44,96922%
Editions Operations Fee£3,975£7,656£3,190£14,8217%
Editions Licence Fee£4,440£11,100£1,200£16,7408%
Total Deliveroo Revenue£61,658£115,858£29,160£207,252100%
Source: Weekly payment statements parsed from both operating companies (ASFL + RBC) ran in parallel through Nov 2025.
Insight: The Acton site generates approximately £120k/yr in Deliveroo revenue at current run-rate — placing it in the top quartile of single-site Editions accounts by per-£ contribution.
Page 3 / 14
BLINDSPOT #1

Deliveroo's account view sees one number — but the underlying P&L tells a different story

What Deliveroo sees in the AM dashboard
£552k
Total Order Value over 22 months. Steady-ish trend. Account flagged "at risk" due to declining 2026 run-rate.
Conclusion drawn: "Underperforming account. Hold pricing."
→
What the operator's P&L actually shows
+£4,387 → -£24,860 → +£2,555
Three distinct years. Profitable 2024. Loss in 2025 driven by one-time labour cost spike. Restructure complete. 2026 YTD profitable.
Reality: "Recovering account. Rent concession unlocks growth."
Implication: The pattern Deliveroo is seeing — declining 2026 revenue — is the operator's deliberate restructure to a sustainable cost stack, not a structural decline. Pricing decisions made on the headline trend will get the call wrong.
Page 4 / 14
BLINDSPOT #2

The rent structure is asymmetric — Deliveroo is risking £100k+ to hold £22k

Exhibit 2: What Deliveroo earns vs. what Deliveroo charges in 'rent'
Deliveroo's annualised revenue from Acton
£121,580/yr
Commission + Ad Spend + Op Fee + Licence
"Rent" component (Licence + Ops Fee)
£22,056/yr
Of which Licence £14,400, Ops Fee £7,656
At risk if operator exits
£99,524/yr
Commission + Ad Spend lost forever
Hold rent at £22k/yr
Waive rent (12-month trial)
Operator stays
+£121k/yr revenue
+£99k/yr revenue + growth optionality
Operator exits
£0/yr — full revenue loss
N/A — waiver removes exit trigger
Insight: The licence + ops fee is the marginal cost that tips the unit from profit to loss for the operator. It represents 18% of Deliveroo's earnings from the account but creates 100% of the exit risk.
Page 5 / 14
BLINDSPOT #3

The 2025 revenue dip wasn't a demand problem — it was an internal labour cost mistake

Exhibit 3: Salary cost as % of Estimated Gross, by year
A
2024: 17.8% salary-to-Est-Gross. Operation profitable. Cost stack tight. Volume rising.
B
2025: 26.7% — overstaffed. Operator added back-of-house headcount expecting volume growth. Volume held flat. Margin collapsed.
C
2026: 19.9% — restructured. Rota tightened, headcount reduced. The operation is profitable again at the lower volume.
Why this matters to Deliveroo: The labour cost discipline is now in place. The unit is on a sustainable cost stack. A modest commercial concession from Deliveroo at this moment turns a stabilised account into a growth account.
Page 6 / 14
Section 2 · The Scale Opportunity

The operator has a credible 3-year scale plan — each additional kitchen adds £100k+/yr to Deliveroo's top line

Exhibit 4: Deliveroo revenue uplift scenarios from operator's expansion plan
ScenarioKitchensDeliveroo Annual Revenuevs Current3-yr Cumulative
Status quo (Acton only)1£121,580—£365k
Plus 1 new kitchen, Year 22£243,160+£121k£608k
Plus 5 new kitchens by Year 35£607,900+£486k£1,520k
Plus 10 kitchens by Year 310£1,215,800+£1.09m£3,040k
The growth dependency is explicit: The operator will not commit to Kitchen #2 without a rent concession on Kitchen #1. The trade is £22k of waived rent for ~£100k+/yr of additional Deliveroo revenue per new site.
Page 7 / 14
Section 2 · Operator Quality Signals

The lead brand (Patri Artisan) delivers a 9.3× return on Deliveroo ad spend — top-decile performance

Patri Artisan
£2,577 spent
9.31×
£23,985 in attributed sales
ROAS > 6× = Top-decile
Rice Bowl Company
£731 spent
3.66×
£2,674 in attributed sales
Target ROAS
VEGN by Patri
£249 spent
5.71×
£1,420 in attributed sales
Vegan niche · strong margin

Ad spend reaches Deliveroo's highest-value segment

Plus Members 36%
Returning 22%
New 11%
Other 31%
Implication: The Patri Artisan brand demonstrates exactly what Deliveroo wants from an Editions partner — high ROAS, Plus member share, repeat purchase. Withdrawing the operator forces the demand back to inferior alternatives.
Page 8 / 14
Section 3 · The Comparator

Dishoom Editions at the same site demonstrates the achievable ceiling — Acton operator has explicit plans to close 50% of the gap

Patri Acton TODAY
£4,800/wk
2026 YTD
← Patri's own peak →
Patri AT PEAK (achievable)
£10,000/wk
Previously achieved
→ target 50% closure of gap →
Stretch Target (Year 3)
£20,000/wk
50% of Dishoom's run-rate
Dishoom Acton (benchmark)
£40,000/wk
Industry estimate
The roadmap is specific: Consolidate from 15 brands to 4 hero brands, anchor bundles at £24.95/£44.95/£79.95 (mirror Dishoom), tighten menu to 25 hero SKUs, lift hero curry pricing 10-15%. Target £10k per week — £520k full year. These are operating changes, not heroics. Deliveroo benefits from the volume uplift directly through commission and ad spend.
Page 9 / 14
Section 4 · The Commercial Ask

A growth-linked partnership: Deliveroo waives rent, operator commits to specific performance metrics

What Deliveroo gives
1. Waive Licence Fee for 12 months · £14,400 forgone
2. Waive Editions Operations Fee for 12 months · £7,656 forgone
3. Cut commission from 28.8% to 20% · £19,000/yr value
4. £7 OFF £7+ always-on inclusion (3 brands) · £15,000/yr value
5. £5k ad credit for Patri Artisan relaunch · £5,000 in-platform credit
6. Featured Editions promotion slot · ~£3,000 promotional value
Total Year-1 commercial cost: ~£64,056
What the operator commits to
1. £10,000/week run-rate by Q4 2026 (£520k full year · +37% vs 2023 peak)
2. AOV uplift £28 → £35+ within 9 months
3. Plus Member order share 36% → 55%+
4. 30-day repeat customer rate 40% → 55%+
5. Brand consolidation: 15 active brands → 4 (Patri Artisan + Rice Bowl + Patri Express + Patri Green)
6. Customer rating 4.2 → 4.5+ (algorithm visibility)
7. Quarterly performance review · rent reinstated if 7+ of 10 metrics missed
If hit: Year-1 commission £104k+ (vs £64k cost) → net +£40k to Deliveroo
Net economic outcome for Deliveroo: Year 1 invests £64k. Year 1 commission on £520k volume = £104k → net +£40k to Deliveroo even before considering Kitchen #2. 3-year cumulative upside: £417k including the scale path.
Page 10 / 14
Section 5 · Timing

Three converging signals make this the right moment for Deliveroo to restructure

1
Restructure is complete
The operator's labour cost discipline is in place. 2026 YTD profitable. The operation isn't asking Deliveroo to fund a turnaround — it's asking for a partnership in the next phase.
2
Precedent already set
Deliveroo reduced the Editions licence fee from £2,220/quarter to £1,200/month in April 2026 (annualised, that's a 35% cut). A further concession is a continuation of policy, not an exception.
3
Scale capacity exists
The operator (Patri Group) has the operating capacity, the brand IP, and the appetite to open 5-10 sites in 3 years. Few Editions partners come with this profile.
Page 11 / 14
THE COUNTERFACTUAL

If Deliveroo holds current pricing, the most likely outcome is operator exit by Q1 2027

Operator's calculus if no concession
Current operating margin: 2-4% post-restructure. Net Deliveroo charges absorb 36% of Net Payable. Without a rent concession, the unit needs ~£8k/wk in revenue to clear hurdles. At current 2026 trajectory (£4-5k/wk), that's not achievable without significant marketing investment Deliveroo isn't currently offering.
The rational exit decision is Q1 2027 — after one more full quarter of data confirms whether the restructure margin holds.
Deliveroo's loss in that scenario
£99,524/yr commission and ad spend lost permanently
£22,056/yr rent revenue lost (the licence + ops fee held instead of waived)
£100k+/yr × 5-10 sites of foregone scale revenue
~30% share-of-stomach in Acton W3 demographic likely flows to a competing aggregator (Uber Eats, JustEat)
Reputation risk: a profitable operator visibly walked from Editions over rent terms
The asymmetry is the point: Deliveroo's downside if it concedes is bounded at £64k of Year-1 cost. Its downside if it holds and the operator exits is £100k+/yr in perpetuity, plus optionality on £1m+ of 3-year scale revenue.
Page 12 / 14
Recommendation

Restructure the commercial terms now, gated on specific operator performance metrics

STEP 1 · This Quarter
Agree commercial restructure: 12-month rent waiver, commission cut to 20%, £5k ad credit, £7 OFF £7+ always-on inclusion, featured slot. Total Year-1 investment ~£45k.
STEP 2 · Quarterly Reviews
Operator commits to 10 performance metrics. Quarterly gate; rent reinstated if 7+ metrics missed. Aligns operator incentives with Deliveroo's growth metrics.
STEP 3 · Year-2 Trigger
If metrics hit, operator opens Kitchen #2 in adjacent West London demographic. Same terms. Path to 5-10 sites by Year 3.
The Commercial Question Reframed
Deliveroo isn't being asked to subsidise a struggling account. It's being asked to share growth optionality with a credible operator. The cost is bounded. The upside isn't.
Page 13 / 14
Appendix · Source & Methodology

Numbers in this deck are reconciled across three independent data sources

Source 1
Deliveroo weekly payment statements · 22 months × 2 entities (ASFL + RBC) · ~190 individual PDFs · all line items captured: Total Order Value, Commission, Marketer Adverts, Editions Op Fee, Licence Fee, Recharges, vouchers, refunds, bag fees.
Source 2
Operator's manual P&L · 96 weekly rows · food cost from purchasing records · salary from rota software · weekly P/L calculations · cross-checked against bank receipts.
Source 3
Industry benchmark data · Dishoom Editions Acton estimated revenue from live menu analysis · ROAS data from Deliveroo Adverts Report · Plus member share from segmentation data.
Methodology notes
  • Estimated Gross = Total Order Value × 1.25 (implied sticker price before Deliveroo's marketer discount, per UK convention)
  • VAT @ 12.5% of Net Payable (HMRC flat-rate scheme for catering)
  • ACT kitchen is Deliveroo Editions only — no Uber or alternative platform revenue/costs
  • 2026 mature run-rate annualised from Jan-Apr actuals to provide forward-looking unit economics
  • All figures cross-checked: manual P&L weekly TOV reconciles to Deliveroo PDFs to within rounding
Page 14 / 14
1 / 14
←→ to navigate